|
|
|
FSFlyingSchool PPL
 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 8:23:55 AM
Posts: 11,
Visits: 76
|
|
| Hi, I currently use the Saitek AV8R joystick for FSX. It is a good joystick,  , but I am thinking of upgrading to a Yoke system. Any thoughts on which one to go for? 
CloudmasterIt's a good landing if you can still get the doors open.
|
|
|
|
|
FSFlyingSchool Training Captain
Group: Moderators
Last Login: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 2:42:12 PM
Posts: 1,645,
Visits: 14,276
|
|
Cloudmaster (7/19/2010)
Hi,
I currently use the Saitek AV8R joystick for FSX. It is a good joystick, , but I am thinking of upgrading to a Yoke system.
Any thoughts on which one to go for?
Well I have a full Saitek Yoke/throttle and Pedal system and this is a very good system. I also had a CH yoke for a while, but the guy who gave it to me, suddenly returned to Flight simming, and so I gave it back to him.
I find the yoke a little lighter in the controlling, and thus making micro-adjustments easier.
The CH pedals are also both nicer to look at, and feels more natural to move than the saitek ones.
BUT - the Saitek system has several advantages also.
I like that the throttle levers are a seperate unit, and can be mounted besides the Yoke. I also have a Saitek Switch panel, and this mounts naturally upon the yoke unit. Several other extras can be bought that mounts on each other very naturally with the saitek system.
AND - I think that the Saitek system are still a little cheaper than the CH.
My two cents.... The decision is yours.
Regards
Ole Andreasen, Denmark
|
|
|
|
|
FSFlyingSchool Developer
Group: Administrators
Last Login: Friday, December 20, 2024 8:59:32 AM
Posts: 5,065,
Visits: 9,200
|
|
| Hi CM: I see Ole has already helped with his experiences - mine are as follows: No experience of Saitek Yoke! CH Yoke is a pleasure to use - used for 5 years and no problems ever. No problems with configuration either. CH Pedals likewise. Great stuff. I have the CH 6 lever throttle quadrant, but have only just got around to mounting it and have not yet programmed it. I have not got it working for me yet - but I am sure that is because I have not yet been able to find the right materials to read.
By default it does not control anything useful from what I can see and the configuration program which is meant to be used with it is unreadable on my LCD screen (no idea why - I am sure it is a simple solution).  It is of a very tough construction - just like the yoke and pedals. I do like the look of all the things you can now add to a Saitek yoke set up - there are lots of gauges and panels. A great way to build a cockpit bit by bit... Or is that Christmas by Christmas...? Or is that Birthday by Birthday...? 
Jeff Preston ('Squadron Leader') - FSFlyingSchool Publisher & Lead Developer
FSFlyingSchool 2023 for Microsoft Flight Simulator
FSFlyingSchool 2023 for X-Plane 12 & 11
FS Instant Approach 2023 for X-Plane 12 & 11 (Windows)
FSFlyingSchool PRO 2020 Prepar3D v 5
FSFlyingSchool PRO 2019 FSX, FSX-SE, FS2004
FSFlyingSchool USA for Microsoft Flight Simulator
FS Instant Approach 2019 for X-Plane 11 (Mac)
FS Instant Approach for Microsoft Flight Simulator
FS Instant Help for FSX, FS2004
Winner of 5 consecutive PC Pilot Magazine 'Classic Product' Awards
Fly like the Pros with X-Plane, Flight Simulator and Prepar3D!
If you wish to unsubscribe simply reply to email with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the SUBJECT line.
|
|
|
|
|
FSFlyingSchool PPL
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 8:23:55 AM
Posts: 11,
Visits: 76
|
|
| Thank you both Ole and SL for your advise. After much deliberation I've decided on the Saitek system.  See you both soon, maybe at Cosford eh!
CloudmasterIt's a good landing if you can still get the doors open.
|
|
|
|
|
FSFlyingSchool Training Captain
Group: Moderators
Last Login: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 2:42:12 PM
Posts: 1,645,
Visits: 14,276
|
|
I dont think you will regret it.
Regards
Ole Andreasen, Denmark
|
|
|
|